The Idiot Index
Executive Extraction in Materials & Chemicals · FY 2023
28 of 38 companies · highest first- 1390.0× CEO / median workerverified
- 2387.6× CEO / median workerverified
- 3355.7× CEO / median workerverified
- 4316.1× CEO / median workerverified
- 5255.7× CEO / median workerverified
- 6253.4× CEO / median workerverified
- 7251.9× CEO / median workerverified
- 8223.8× CEO / median workerverified
- 9220.2× CEO / median workerverified
- 10212.8× CEO / median workerverified
Not yet covered (10)
These companies are in the Materials & Chemicals cohort but don't have a Executive Extraction computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →How many times a CEO out-earns the median employee.
- Ratio
- Executive Extraction
- Sector
- Materials & Chemicals
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to chemicals, industrial gases, mining, metals, and packaging companies. COGS captures raw material extraction, refining, and primary processing — this sector is the "stuff that becomes other stuff" layer of the economy. Markup ratios are cyclical with commodity input costs; sector medians are the right comparison. Shareholder Extraction is informative because materials companies face structural choices between buybacks and reinvestment in capacity.
Required disclosure under Dodd-Frank Section 953(b) since 2018. Filed in DEF 14A proxy statements. The dashboard aggregates the disclosure across the top 50 and ranks.
Source data: CEO total compensation and median employee compensation, both as filed in the company's most recent DEF 14A. When the ratio is XBRL-tagged we use the tagged value; otherwise the narrative disclosure is parsed (~99% accuracy).