The Idiot Index
Labor Share in Food & Beverage · FY 2023
22 of 34 companies · highest first- 10.3287of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 20.2895of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 30.2800of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 40.2405of revenue → workersverified
- 50.2226of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 60.1972of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 70.1717of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 80.1674of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 90.1668of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 100.1655of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
Not yet covered (12)
These companies are in the Food & Beverage cohort but don't have a Labor Share computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →How much of every revenue dollar reaches workers.
- Ratio
- Labor Share
- Sector
- Food & Beverage
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to packaged-food, beverage, and quick-service restaurant companies. COGS captures ingredients, packaging, and (for QSR) franchise-operated cost of revenue. The Markup Ratio is meaningful but the Operational Markup is the cleaner signal because brand investment flows through SG&A — and Shareholder Extraction often runs high because mature consumer-staples brands return capital aggressively rather than reinvest.
How much of revenue flows to the people creating it. Includes wages, salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation.
When direct disclosure is missing: approximated as Headcount × Median Pay × 1.30 (1.30 grosses up base pay to fully-loaded compensation including benefits and equity). The approximation is documented per company on its detail page.
Source data: LaborAndRelatedExpense, ShareBasedCompensation (us-gaap), or EmployeeBenefitsExpense (ifrs-full). When approximated: NumberOfEmployees × disclosed median compensation.