The Idiot Index
Labor Share in Materials & Chemicals · FY 2023
22 of 38 companies · highest first- 10.2808of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 20.2735of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 30.2663of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 40.2427of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 50.2253of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 60.2055of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 70.1994of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 80.1444of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 90.1426of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
- 100.1398of revenue → workersverifiedapprox.
Not yet covered (16)
These companies are in the Materials & Chemicals cohort but don't have a Labor Share computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →How much of every revenue dollar reaches workers.
- Ratio
- Labor Share
- Sector
- Materials & Chemicals
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to chemicals, industrial gases, mining, metals, and packaging companies. COGS captures raw material extraction, refining, and primary processing — this sector is the "stuff that becomes other stuff" layer of the economy. Markup ratios are cyclical with commodity input costs; sector medians are the right comparison. Shareholder Extraction is informative because materials companies face structural choices between buybacks and reinvestment in capacity.
How much of revenue flows to the people creating it. Includes wages, salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation.
When direct disclosure is missing: approximated as Headcount × Median Pay × 1.30 (1.30 grosses up base pay to fully-loaded compensation including benefits and equity). The approximation is documented per company on its detail page.
Source data: LaborAndRelatedExpense, ShareBasedCompensation (us-gaap), or EmployeeBenefitsExpense (ifrs-full). When approximated: NumberOfEmployees × disclosed median compensation.