The Idiot Index
Markup in Food & Beverage · FY 2023
22 of 34 companies · highest first- 13.8168× revenue / costverified
- 23.6540× revenue / costverified
- 32.5171× revenue / costverified
- 42.4725× revenue / costverified
- 52.2777× revenue / costverified
- 62.2227× revenue / costverified
- 72.1436× revenue / costverified
- 81.9996× revenue / costverified
- 91.8224× revenue / costverified
- 101.7734× revenue / costverified
Not yet covered (12)
These companies are in the Food & Beverage cohort but don't have a Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →How much revenue per dollar of cost.
- Ratio
- Markup
- Sector
- Food & Beverage
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to packaged-food, beverage, and quick-service restaurant companies. COGS captures ingredients, packaging, and (for QSR) franchise-operated cost of revenue. The Markup Ratio is meaningful but the Operational Markup is the cleaner signal because brand investment flows through SG&A — and Shareholder Extraction often runs high because mature consumer-staples brands return capital aggressively rather than reinvest.
Captures gross extraction per dollar of input. A markup ratio of 5.0 means the company collects $5 in revenue for every $1 of cost-of-goods.
Source data: Revenues (us-gaap:Revenues / ifrs-full:Revenue) and CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold (us-gaap) or CostOfSales (ifrs-full).