The Idiot Index
Markup in Materials & Chemicals · FY 2023
32 of 38 companies · highest first- 11.7494× revenue / costverified
- 21.7492× revenue / costverified
- 31.6979× revenue / costverified
- 41.6719× revenue / costverified
- 51.6335× revenue / costverified
- 61.5750× revenue / costverified
- 71.5422× revenue / costverified
- 81.4783× revenue / costverified
- 91.4715× revenue / costverified
- 101.4581× revenue / costverified
Not yet covered (6)
These companies are in the Materials & Chemicals cohort but don't have a Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →How much revenue per dollar of cost.
- Ratio
- Markup
- Sector
- Materials & Chemicals
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to chemicals, industrial gases, mining, metals, and packaging companies. COGS captures raw material extraction, refining, and primary processing — this sector is the "stuff that becomes other stuff" layer of the economy. Markup ratios are cyclical with commodity input costs; sector medians are the right comparison. Shareholder Extraction is informative because materials companies face structural choices between buybacks and reinvestment in capacity.
Captures gross extraction per dollar of input. A markup ratio of 5.0 means the company collects $5 in revenue for every $1 of cost-of-goods.
Source data: Revenues (us-gaap:Revenues / ifrs-full:Revenue) and CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold (us-gaap) or CostOfSales (ifrs-full).