The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Consumer Internet · FY 2023
24 of 37 companies · highest first- 12.8811× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 21.6569× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.4399× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.3995× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.3899× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.3237× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.2636× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.2499× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.2294× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.2282× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (13)
These companies are in the Consumer Internet cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Consumer Internet
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to companies whose primary cost basis is cloud infrastructure and customer-facing operations rather than physical materials. The Markup Ratio carries explicit context that COGS captures non-material inputs.
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.