The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Food & Beverage · FY 2023
18 of 34 companies · highest first- 11.4812× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 21.4801× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.4264× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.4251× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.4197× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.2882× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.2721× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.2689× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.2229× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.2087× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (16)
These companies are in the Food & Beverage cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Food & Beverage
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to packaged-food, beverage, and quick-service restaurant companies. COGS captures ingredients, packaging, and (for QSR) franchise-operated cost of revenue. The Markup Ratio is meaningful but the Operational Markup is the cleaner signal because brand investment flows through SG&A — and Shareholder Extraction often runs high because mature consumer-staples brands return capital aggressively rather than reinvest.
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.