The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Hardware Manufacturing · FY 2023
24 of 45 companies · highest first- 11.4241× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 21.2633× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.2285× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.2272× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.2256× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.2199× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.1767× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.1711× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.1710× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.1657× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (21)
These companies are in the Hardware Manufacturing cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Hardware Manufacturing
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to companies whose primary cost basis is physical materials and manufacturing.
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.