The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Pharma & Healthcare · FY 2023
37 of 48 companies · highest first- 15.1706× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 23.5693× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.6160× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.5805× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.5704× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.4683× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.4682× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.4353× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.4165× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.4082× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (11)
These companies are in the Pharma & Healthcare cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Pharma & Healthcare
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to pharmaceutical and integrated healthcare companies. COGS captures manufacturing of drugs, devices, and clinical services; R&D in this sector is capitalized into pipeline value rather than expensed-and-forgotten, so the Shareholder Extraction ratio carries explicit weight as an indicator of capital allocation priority.
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.