The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Semiconductor · FY 2023
26 of 34 companies · highest first- 11.9965× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 21.5617× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.4799× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.4612× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.4500× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.4418× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.4259× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.4117× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.3529× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.3356× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (8)
These companies are in the Semiconductor cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Semiconductor
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to fabless and integrated semiconductor companies. COGS captures wafer, foundry, packaging, and test costs; Operational Markup is the more cyclically-stable indicator across product cycles.
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.