The Idiot Index
Operational Markup in Software Platform · FY 2023
24 of 40 companies · highest first- 11.7122× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 21.5876× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 31.5812× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 41.2933× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 51.2538× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 61.2506× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 71.2416× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 81.2136× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 91.2118× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
- 101.1457× revenue / (cost + opex)verified
Not yet covered (16)
These companies are in the Software Platform cohort but don't have a Operational Markup computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Revenue per dollar of cost + operating expenses. The multiplier after legitimate operations.
- Ratio
- Operational Markup
- Sector
- Software Platform
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to enterprise and developer-platform software companies. COGS captures hosting, support, and customer-success costs; the Markup Ratio is meaningful but the Operational Markup is the load-bearing indicator because most platform investment flows through OpEx (R&D, S&M).
The multiplier after legitimate operations. A high Markup combined with a low Operational Markup tells a specific story: surplus is being reinvested in the business. A high Markup combined with a high Operational Markup tells the opposite story: surplus is going to shareholders.
Source data: Revenues, CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, OperatingExpenses (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.