The Idiot Index
Shareholder Extraction in Food & Beverage · FY 2023
19 of 34 companies · highest first- 174.64× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 256.01× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 333.11× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 428.52× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 518.13× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 616.16× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 715.93× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 815.06× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 914.47× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
- 1011.34× buybacks+dividends / R&Dverified
Not yet covered (15)
These companies are in the Food & Beverage cohort but don't have a Shareholder Extraction computed for FY 2023. Either the underlying inputs aren't tagged in their XBRL filings, the DEF 14A pay-ratio narrative didn't parse cleanly, or this fiscal year hasn't been ingested for them yet.
What this measures
Full methodology →Dollars sent to shareholders for every dollar invested in R&D.
- Ratio
- Shareholder Extraction
- Sector
- Food & Beverage
- Methodology version
- v1.0.0
Applied to packaged-food, beverage, and quick-service restaurant companies. COGS captures ingredients, packaging, and (for QSR) franchise-operated cost of revenue. The Markup Ratio is meaningful but the Operational Markup is the cleaner signal because brand investment flows through SG&A — and Shareholder Extraction often runs high because mature consumer-staples brands return capital aggressively rather than reinvest.
Whether the company invests in future productive capacity or extracts current value to shareholders. A ratio above 3.0 typically indicates an extraction-dominant capital allocation policy. A ratio below 1.0 indicates the company is investing more in its future than returning to shareholders.
Source data: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock, PaymentsOfDividends, ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense (us-gaap) or equivalents in IFRS.